pledgeCurrent
Loans
Evaluate BTC-backed loan platforms across safety, pricing, custody, and borrower fit.
Compare my loan
Data checked June 21, 2026Safety-ranked guide
Safety-ranked Bitcoin-backed loans in 2026, with collateral protection first
We evaluated the lenders we track on custody model, rehypothecation risk, regulatory compliance, reserve transparency, track record, liquidation practices, loss protection, and transparency. Use the ordering as a safety-first starting map, not as a universal lender recommendation.
After Celsius, BlockFi, and Voyager collapsed in 2022, the first question for BTC-backed lending stopped being only "what's the rate?" and became "what happens to my Bitcoin if something goes wrong?" We built our safety scoring methodology around that question. Every lender below is scored out of 10 on eight weighted factors, with collateral protection weighted ahead of teaser pricing.
If your first question is pricing rather than collateral protection, read the APR snapshot or the cost guide before narrowing the field. If the real blocker is understanding how Pledge scores safety, open the methodology.
Safety-first starting points in the current tracked set
These are the clearest starting points when collateral protection leads the decision. Each one represents a different custody model, so the next move is usually the full review rather than stopping at the headline position.
KEY
#1 Unchained9.02/10
Multi-sig custody where you hold your own keys (2-of-3), zero rehypothecation, and operating since 2016 — the highest safety score in our tracked dataset.
BNK
#2 Xapo Bank8.83/10
Gibraltar-regulated bank with no rehypothecation, Big 4 audited financial statements, and 10.5% APR. A safety-first custodial option in our tracked dataset — your BTC is held by a licensed bank.
DEF
#3 Aave8.33/10
Largest DeFi protocol ($23B+ TVL) with non-custodial smart contracts, no rehypothecation, and variable APR from 1.5–3%. No KYC required.
Full 2026 lender comparison — all 15 ranked
| # | Lender | Safety | APR | Max LTV | Custody |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Unchained9.02/10 | 9.02 | 12% + fees (~14.2% eff.) | 50% | Multi-sig (you hold keys) |
| 2 | Xapo Bank8.83/10 | 8.83 | 10.5% | 40% | Custodial (regulated bank) |
| 3 | Aave8.33/10 | 8.33 | 1.5–3.0% variable | 73% | Non-custodial (DeFi) |
| 4 | Maker (Sky)8.15/10 | 8.15 | 9.0–16.0% stability fee | 67% | Non-custodial (DeFi) |
| 5 | Ledn7.41/10 | 7.41 | 9.25–11.49% | 50% | Custodial (BitGo) |
| 6 | Arch Lending7.03/10 | 7.03 | 7.25–10.49% advertised | 60% | Custodial (Anchorage Digital) |
| 7 | SALT Lending5.53/10 | 5.53 | 7.49–10.5% | 70% | Custodial (BitGo) |
| 8 | Figure7.1/10 | 7.1 | 8.91% rate (9.999% APR) | 50% | Custodial (MPC) |
| 9 | Nexo5.25/10 | 5.25 | 1.9%* | 50% | Custodial |
| 10 | YouHodler4.02/10 | 4.02 | 6.497–25.988% | Quote form | Custodial |
| 11 | Lava3.39/10 | 3.39 | 7.5% | 50% | Custody unresolved |
Safety scores are calculated using our 8-factor methodology (aligned with data on our About page). APRs are current as of June 21, 2026and may vary by loan size and term. *Nexo's public from-rate rung requires NEXO token exposure; YouHodler's tracked BTC product now uses 30-day daily-fee tiers that run roughly 10.99–19.02% APR depending on LTV. Figure's effective rate includes a 1% origination fee. Arch's displayed range is its advertised APR ladder, inclusive of a 0.49–1.49% origination fee that varies by loan size. SALT charges no origination fee. Xapo's 40% max LTV is one of the most conservative CeFi options we track. Aave and Maker are DeFi protocols using WBTC (Wrapped Bitcoin) — variable rates fluctuate with pool utilization. Maker's WBTC liquidation penalty was cut to 0% in the Oct-2024 offboarding vote, and its stability fee is governance-set and variable.
How did we rank these lenders?
Our safety score weighs eight factors that directly affect whether your BTC is protected. This is the same methodology we use across every comparison on Pledge, and you can read the full breakdown on our methodology page.
25%Custody model
Do you hold your own keys, or does the lender? Unchained (9.02) uses multi-sig where you are a required signer. Xapo Bank (8.83) is a regulated bank with full banking license. Aave (8.33) and Maker (8.15) are non-custodial DeFi protocols — collateral locked in audited smart contracts. Ledn (7.41), Figure (7.10), and Arch (7.03) use custodial or custodial-adjacent models with additional controls. Nexo (5.3) and YouHodler (4.02) score lower because more terms are account- or form-dependent.
25%Rehypothecation policy
Does the lender re-lend, re-pledge, or otherwise use your BTC? This is the exact risk that sank Celsius. Unchained, Xapo Bank, Figure, Arch Lending, Aave, and Maker have stronger no-reuse language or architecture in our current data. Lava previously claimed no rehypothecation, but because its custody model is now unresolved (reporting indicates a move to custodial cold storage as of Nov 2025), that no-reuse claim can no longer be treated as architecturally enforced. Ledn has Open Book reporting but allows re-posting to institutional funding partners; SALT risk disclosures are broader than marketing; Strike is not fully documented publicly; Nexo and YouHodler remain more account- or form-dependent.
20%Reserve transparency
Can the lender prove they actually hold your BTC? We check for regular third-party attestations, on-chain verification, or banking-grade audits. Platforms with recurring reserve reporting like Ledn (Open Book Report) and independent attestations like Unchained, Arch, and Nexo score highest. DeFi protocols like Aave and Maker expose balances and liabilities on-chain, but rates and risk parameters can still move with protocol markets.
15%Regulatory compliance
Is the lender registered with relevant financial authorities? Do they operate under lending licenses? US-based, regulated lenders score highest. Offshore or lightly-regulated platforms lose points here — especially if they have faced regulatory actions in the past.
15%Track record
How long has the lender been operating through real market stress? Xapo Bank has been running since 2013 — more than a decade of operating history — and Unchained since 2016. Maker has operated since 2017 (one of the oldest DeFi protocols we track). SALT has operated since 2016 and survived the 2022 downturn. Ledn and Figure have operated since 2018. Aave launched in 2020 but has $23B+ TVL and six security audits. Newer platforms like Arch Lending (2022) and Lava (2023) have shorter track records, which tempers their scores.
Use the safety ranking to choose the next research path
The score helps frame the tradeoffs, but it should not pretend every borrower has the same answer. Start with the path that matches your real constraint, then read the full review before treating any row as final.
KEYYou want the clearest custody-first option
Start with UnchainedSafety score 9.02/10 — the only tracked CeFi lender where borrowers retain majority key control via 2-of-3 multi-sig. Zero rehypothecation, operating since 2016, and your BTC cannot move without your signature. The trade-off is a higher effective APR (~14.2% with fees) and a $150K minimum loan.
BNKYou want the clearest custodial safety-first option
Start with Xapo BankSafety score 8.83/10 — Gibraltar-regulated bank with no rehypothecation and Big 4 audited financial statements. Your BTC is held by a licensed bank, not a crypto company. 10.5% APR with a conservative 40% max LTV. $1,000 minimum loan makes it accessible.
LOWYou want the lowest-cost BTC-first route
Start with Lava7.5% APR plus a separate 2% capital charge. Safety score 3.39/10. Lowest BTC-first pricing in our tracked dataset — but Lava's custody model is unresolved (reporting indicates a move to custodial cold storage as of Nov 2025, while its site still markets self-custody), so the score is pending verification and this is not a headline safety pick.
SIGYou want to keep your keys
Start with Unchained or LavaUnchained uses a 2-of-3 multi-sig where you hold 2 keys — your BTC literally cannot move without you. Aave (8.33/10) and Maker (8.15/10) are fully non-custodial via audited smart contracts — but use WBTC (Wrapped Bitcoin), adding BitGo custodial risk. Lava (3.39/10, 6.5–7.5% APR) is a DeFi-origin lender, but its custody model is unresolved (reportedly custodial as of Nov 2025) and it has the shortest track record (est. 2023).
LTVYou want the most borrowing flexibility
Start with YouHodler or NexoYouHodler offers loan-form LTV on 30-day terms and Nexo offers a revolving credit line with no origination fees. YouHodler carries a 4.02/10 safety score and Nexo a 5.25/10 because both require active term verification: YouHodler's loan form controls LTV/PDL, while Nexo's collateral and pricing terms are account-dependent. Best for experienced borrowers who actively manage risk.
The bottom line
If safety is your top priority, start with Unchained (9.02/10) and the custody framework around it. No other tracked CeFi lender gives borrowers majority key control while they borrow, but the ~14.2% effective APR and $150K minimum mean this is a specific fit, not a universal winner.
If you want top-tier safety without self-custody complexity, Xapo Bank (8.83/10) is the clearest custodial safety-first option. Aave (8.33/10, 1.5–3.0% variable) and Maker (8.15/10, 9.0–16.0% stability fee) are the top DeFi options, while Ledn (7.41/10, 9.25–11.49% APR) and Arch Lending (7.03/10, advertised 7.25–10.49% range before fees) remain strong CeFi reads once you want the review-level details.
If you need maximum borrowing power, YouHodler (loan-form LTV) lets you extract the most liquidity per BTC, but the lower safety score and extreme liquidation sensitivity mean this should be read as a high-risk edge case rather than a broad recommendation.
Explore top lenders
Move from ranking to research
Keep the next step in the research flow, not the comparison flow
This page shows which structures score strongest on collateral protection in the abstract. The next move is usually the loan hub, the methodology, or a control-model guide depending on whether your blocker is borrower fit, scoring logic, or key control.
Keep in view
- Open the loan hub if you still need to connect safety, pricing, and eligibility in one place
- Read methodology if you want to understand what the score is actually measuring
- Branch into the control-model guide if key control is the real question behind the loan choice
Next
Go to the useful screen
Continue with the tool or guide that matches the question you just narrowed.
Choose next screen
Treat this guide as research, then move into the category hubs
This article is still a strong long-form read, but the main product now lives in the category hubs. Use the loan hub for borrower-fit research, and branch into control-model guides or stablecoins when the question stops being just about borrowing.
Adjacent
Digital Credit
Track Bitcoin-linked dollar and credit products by backing, yield source, redemption path, and issuer-specific risk.
Compare Digital Money
Support
Control models
Supporting research on collaborative custody, self-custody support, and institutional control-model tradeoffs.
Review custody model
Related Guides
This guide is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. APRs and terms are as of April 2026 and may change. Bitcoin-backed loans carry liquidation risk — if BTC drops significantly, you may lose your collateral. Always read the lender's terms before borrowing.