1
Hashrate — the size of the fleet
How much computing power the miner runs, in exahashes per second (EH/s).
Hashrate is the headline number: it is roughly how big a miner's fleet of machines is, and it sets the company's share of the whole Bitcoin network — and therefore its share of the new Bitcoin being issued. More hashrate usually means more Bitcoin mined. But scale is only half the story: a huge fleet of inefficient machines, or one running on expensive power, can still lose money. That is why the comparison plots hashrate on one axis and efficiency on the other.
See the hashrate axis on the scatter →2
Efficiency — revenue per EH/s
Dollars earned for each unit of hashrate the company runs.
Two miners can run the same hashrate and earn very different amounts. Dividing revenue by hashrate gives a rough read on how well a company converts raw compute into dollars — a function of newer machines, cheaper power, and tighter operations. On the comparison, the sweet spot is the top-right: a large fleet that still earns a lot per EH/s. One honest caveat the chart marks: companies pivoting to AI book revenue from renting out compute, not from mining — so a high efficiency reading for a small-hashrate company can be the pivot showing up, not mining strength.
Find the big-and-efficient sweet spot →3
Energy mix & cost — the largest ongoing expense
Where the power comes from, how clean it is, and how much it costs.
Electricity is a miner's biggest recurring cost, so the price and source of its power decide whether it survives a downturn. Cheap, abundant energy — hydro, nuclear, wind, or otherwise wasted grid power — keeps a miner profitable when Bitcoin's price falls or the network gets harder to mine. A higher renewable share can also lower regulatory and reputational risk. The comparison shows each miner's energy mix as bars, and renewable share is one of the factors that feeds the score.
Compare energy-mix bars →4
HODL vs. sell — what they do with what they mine
Whether a miner keeps its Bitcoin or sells it to fund operations.
Every miner faces the same choice each month: hold the Bitcoin it produces or sell it to pay for power, payroll, and expansion. A miner that holds builds a Bitcoin treasury, and its stock starts to behave a little like a leveraged bet on the price. A miner that sells funds itself without diluting shareholders or taking on debt, but keeps less upside if Bitcoin rises. There is no single right answer — it is a strategy choice, and the comparison surfaces how much Bitcoin each company actually holds.
See BTC held per miner →5
The AI / HPC pivot — a second business
Repurposing power and data centers to host AI and high-performance computing.
A miner's two scarcest assets are large, contracted power and data-center real estate — exactly what the AI boom is short on. Several public miners are now leasing some of that capacity to host AI and high-performance-computing workloads, chasing steadier revenue that does not swing with the Bitcoin price. The trade-off: the company becomes less of a pure Bitcoin play, and funding the buildout can mean selling mined coins or issuing new shares. Because pivoting miners earn from compute rather than hashrate, the comparison rings and tags them so their efficiency reading is read in context.
See which miners are pivoting →